data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3df2a/3df2ab7a4168404af0606d348da17a1b80b6c2cf" alt=""
As a male American born in the last 50 years, I can say with confidence that the mythical figure of James Bond has influenced my upbringing and views on action movies. The Bond series has grossed $1.6 billion in the box office, making it the #3 most successful movie series of all time. The early movies turned Sean Connery into a legend, and built up the "action-movie cred" for the following Bonds. Through the Cold War and beyond, James Bond resonated with a culture that glorified adventure and perceived itself in a global struggle against evil. However, the times seem to be turning against iconic 007.
The early Bond movies were ground-breaking in their well-developed spy plots, advanced special effects and risque sexual innuendo. As the franchise wore on, paying for the latter two elements seems to have been put ahead of the plot. The first Bond film, Dr. No (1962), had a budget of just $1,000,000 while the most recent, Quantum of Solace (2009) cost a whopping $230,000,000 to produce. The rapidly rising budget for each Bond film can be seen in the graph above. While all of them have turned a box-office profit (shown in yellow) it hasn't been enough to keep MGM out of the red. So far, the studio hasn't been able to find a buyer, and so the 23rd Bond film has been put on hold indefinitely.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b435e/b435ef51fb494f44f3a8d579d04ffd16afeec18a" alt="Check Spelling"
No one's willing to buy out
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53499/5349975ec9b1b56d681e8bcc1d06f5c5e065c49d" alt=""
Unfashionably Economic
Data for the graphs taken from the James Bond Wiki.
No comments:
Post a Comment